linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sched/topology: Don't try to build empty sched domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:08:50 +0100
From:   Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        lizefan@...wei.com, tj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        qperret@...gle.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sched/topology: Don't try to build empty sched
 domains

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:23:12PM +0100, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
> Do you reckon the following would work? 
LGTM (i.e. cpuset will be skipped if no CPUs taking part in load
balancing remain in it after hot(un)plug event).

Michal

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)