[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191101100850.GA16165@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:08:50 +0100
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan@...wei.com, tj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
qperret@...gle.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sched/topology: Don't try to build empty sched
domains
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:23:12PM +0100, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
> Do you reckon the following would work?
LGTM (i.e. cpuset will be skipped if no CPUs taking part in load
balancing remain in it after hot(un)plug event).
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists