[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05813c82394481f5dc946b482902dc6cc2b91a44.1572606437.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:51:25 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com, mazziesaccount@...il.com
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 15/15] gpio: bd71828: Initial support for ROHM BD71828
PMIC GPIOs
ROHM BD71828 PMIC contains 4 pins which can be configured by OTP
to be used for general purposes. First 3 can be used as outputs
and 4.th pin can be used as input. Allow them to be controlled
via GPIO framework.
The driver assumes all of the pins are configured as GPIOs and
trusts that the reserved pins in other OTP configurations are
excluded from control using "gpio-reserved-ranges" device tree
property (or left untouched by GPIO users).
Typical use for 4.th pin (input) is to use it as HALL sensor
input so that this pin state is toggled when HALL sensor detects
LID position change (from close to open or open to close). PMIC
HW implements some extra logic which allows PMIC to power-up the
system when this pin is toggled. Please see the data sheet for
details of GPIO options which can be selected by OTP settings.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
---
Changes since v2 - fixed typo from commit msg, used generic GPIO_IN
and GPIO_OUT instead of defining driver local ones.
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 12 +++
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71828.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71828.c
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
index 38e096e6925f..b4089096f7f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
@@ -994,6 +994,18 @@ config GPIO_BD70528
This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
will be called gpio-bd70528.
+config GPIO_BD71828
+ tristate "ROHM BD71828 GPIO support"
+ depends on MFD_ROHM_BD71828
+ help
+ Support for GPIOs on ROHM BD71828 PMIC. There are three GPIOs
+ available on the ROHM PMIC in total. The GPIOs are limited to
+ outputs only and pins must be configured to GPIO outputs by
+ OTP. Enable this only if you want to use these pins as outputs.
+
+ This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
+ will be called gpio-bd71828.
+
config GPIO_BD9571MWV
tristate "ROHM BD9571 GPIO support"
depends on MFD_BD9571MWV
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
index d2fd19c15bae..034b38996579 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ASPEED) += gpio-aspeed.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ATH79) += gpio-ath79.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BCM_KONA) += gpio-bcm-kona.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD70528) += gpio-bd70528.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD71828) += gpio-bd71828.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BD9571MWV) += gpio-bd9571mwv.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BRCMSTB) += gpio-brcmstb.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_BT8XX) += gpio-bt8xx.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71828.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71828.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a8ab6085c2e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71828.c
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright (C) 2018 ROHM Semiconductors
+
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd71828.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+#define GPIO_OUT_REG(off) (BD71828_REG_GPIO_CTRL1 + (off))
+#define HALL_GPIO_OFFSET 3
+
+struct bd71828_gpio {
+ struct rohm_regmap_dev chip;
+ struct gpio_chip gpio;
+};
+
+static void bd71828_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
+ int value)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct bd71828_gpio *bdgpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ u8 val = (value) ? BD71828_GPIO_OUT_HI : BD71828_GPIO_OUT_LO;
+
+ /*
+ * The HALL input pin can only be used as input. If this is the pin
+ * we are dealing with - then we are done
+ */
+ if (offset == HALL_GPIO_OFFSET)
+ return;
+
+ ret = regmap_update_bits(bdgpio->chip.regmap, GPIO_OUT_REG(offset),
+ BD71828_GPIO_OUT_MASK, val);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(bdgpio->chip.dev, "Could not set gpio to %d\n", value);
+}
+
+static int bd71828_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int val;
+ struct bd71828_gpio *bdgpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+ if (offset == HALL_GPIO_OFFSET)
+ ret = regmap_read(bdgpio->chip.regmap, BD71828_REG_IO_STAT,
+ &val);
+ else
+ ret = regmap_read(bdgpio->chip.regmap, GPIO_OUT_REG(offset),
+ &val);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = (val & BD71828_GPIO_OUT_MASK);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int bd71828_gpio_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
+ unsigned long config)
+{
+ struct bd71828_gpio *bdgpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+ if (offset == HALL_GPIO_OFFSET)
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+ switch (pinconf_to_config_param(config)) {
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+ return regmap_update_bits(bdgpio->chip.regmap,
+ GPIO_OUT_REG(offset),
+ BD71828_GPIO_DRIVE_MASK,
+ BD71828_GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN);
+ case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+ return regmap_update_bits(bdgpio->chip.regmap,
+ GPIO_OUT_REG(offset),
+ BD71828_GPIO_DRIVE_MASK,
+ BD71828_GPIO_PUSH_PULL);
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static int bd71828_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ /*
+ * Pin usage is selected by OTP data. We can't read it runtime. Hence
+ * we trust that if the pin is not excluded by "gpio-reserved-ranges"
+ * the OTP configuration is set to OUT. (Other pins but HALL input pin
+ * on BD71828 can't really be used for general purpose input - input
+ * states are used for specific cases like regulator control or
+ * PMIC_ON_REQ.
+ */
+ if (offset == HALL_GPIO_OFFSET)
+ return GPIO_IN;
+
+ return GPIO_OUT;
+}
+
+static int bd71828_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct bd71828_gpio *bdgpio;
+ struct rohm_regmap_dev *bd71828;
+
+ bd71828 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+ if (!bd71828) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No MFD driver data\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ bdgpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*bdgpio),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!bdgpio)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ bdgpio->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
+ bdgpio->gpio.parent = pdev->dev.parent;
+ bdgpio->gpio.label = "bd71828-gpio";
+ bdgpio->gpio.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ bdgpio->gpio.get_direction = bd71828_get_direction;
+ bdgpio->gpio.set_config = bd71828_gpio_set_config;
+ bdgpio->gpio.can_sleep = true;
+ bdgpio->gpio.get = bd71828_gpio_get;
+ bdgpio->gpio.set = bd71828_gpio_set;
+ bdgpio->gpio.base = -1;
+
+ /*
+ * See if we need some implementation to mark some PINs as
+ * not controllable based on DT info or if core can handle
+ * "gpio-reserved-ranges" and exclude them from control
+ */
+ bdgpio->gpio.ngpio = 4;
+ bdgpio->gpio.of_node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
+ bdgpio->chip.regmap = bd71828->regmap;
+
+ return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &bdgpio->gpio,
+ bdgpio);
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver bd71828_gpio = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "bd71828-gpio"
+ },
+ .probe = bd71828_probe,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(bd71828_gpio);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("BD71828 voltage regulator driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:bd71828-gpio");
--
2.21.0
--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists