linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib: optimize cpumask_local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191031173721.e2a40b037799a149433a4867@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:37:21 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, yuqi jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: optimize cpumask_local_spread()

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:03:33 +0800 Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com> wrote:

> From: yuqi jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>
> 
> In the multi-processor and NUMA system, A device may have many numa
> nodes belonging to multiple cpus. When we get a local numa, it is better
> to find the node closest to the local numa node to return instead of
> going to the online cpu immediately.
> 
> For example, In Huawei Kunpeng 920 system, there are 4 NUMA node(0 -3)
> in the 2-socket system(0 - 1). If the I/O device is in socket1
> and the local NUMA node is 2, we shall choose the non-local node3 in
> the same socket when cpu core in NUMA node2 is less that I/O requirements.
> If we directly pick one cpu core from all online ones, it may be in
> the another socket and it is not friendly for performance.
> 
> ...
>
> Changes from RFC:
>      Address Michal Hocko's comment: Use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL

Are you sure this is necessary?  cpumask_local_spread() is typically
called when a device driver is initializing irq affinities, and
sleeping allocations are usually OK at driver initialization time.  If
there is some driver which is calling cpumask_local_spread() from
atomic context, I bet it's pretty easy to fix.

> --- a/lib/cpumask.c
> +++ b/lib/cpumask.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,33 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static void calc_node_distance(int *node_dist, int node)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
> +		node_dist[i] = node_distance(node, i);
> +}
> +
> +static int find_nearest_node(int *node_dist, bool *used_flag)

The name "used_flag" is rather redundant for a thing of type bool - we
know it's a flag!  "used" would suffice.

> +{
> +	int i, min_dist = node_dist[0], node_id = -1;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
> +		if (used_flag[i] == 0) {
> +			min_dist = node_dist[i];
> +			node_id = i;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
> +		if (node_dist[i] < min_dist && used_flag[i] == 0) {
> +			min_dist = node_dist[i];
> +			node_id = i;
> +		}
> +
> +	return node_id;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cpumask_local_spread - select the i'th cpu with local numa cpu's first
>   * @i: index number
> @@ -205,7 +232,8 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
>   */
>  unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)

Yes, this has become quite an expensive function.  That seems harmless
given the typical callsites.

>  {
> -	int cpu;
> +	int cpu, j, id, *node_dist;
> +	bool *used_flag;
>  
>  	/* Wrap: we always want a cpu. */
>  	i %= num_online_cpus();
> @@ -215,19 +243,45 @@ unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
>  			if (i-- == 0)
>  				return cpu;
>  	} else {
> -		/* NUMA first. */
> -		for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask)
> -			if (i-- == 0)
> -				return cpu;
> +		node_dist = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids, sizeof(int), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		if (!node_dist)
> +			for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask)
> +				if (i-- == 0)
> +					return cpu;
>  
> -		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> -			/* Skip NUMA nodes, done above. */
> -			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node)))
> -				continue;
> +		used_flag = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids, sizeof(bool), GFP_ATOMIC);

This could actually be an array of bits (include/linux/bitmap.h), but
it hardly seems important.

In fact with CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT <= 10, such a bitmap would have max
size of 128 bytes and could be a local.  But again, this is unimportant
as long as the other kmalloc is in there.


> +		if (!used_flag)
> +			for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask)
> +				if (i-- == 0) {
> +					kfree(node_dist);
> +					return cpu;
> +				}
> +		memset(used_flag, 0, nr_node_ids * sizeof(bool));
>  
> -			if (i-- == 0)
> -				return cpu;
> +		calc_node_distance(node_dist, node);
> +		for (j = 0; j < nr_node_ids; j++) {
> +			id = find_nearest_node(node_dist, used_flag);
> +			if (id < 0)
> +				break;
> +			for_each_cpu_and(cpu,
> +				cpumask_of_node(id), cpu_online_mask)
> +				if (i-- == 0) {
> +					kfree(node_dist);
> +					kfree(used_flag);
> +					return cpu;
> +				}
> +			used_flag[id] = 1;
>  		}
> +
> +		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask)
> +			if (i-- == 0) {
> +				kfree(node_dist);
> +				kfree(used_flag);
> +				return cpu;
> +			}
> +
> +		kfree(node_dist);
> +		kfree(used_flag);
>  	}
>  	BUG();
>  }