[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5DBC4FFB.5030200@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 23:32:11 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/ioremap: Use WARN_ONCE instead of printk() + WARN_ON_ONCE()
On 2019/11/1 16:45, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:54:24PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> Yep, WARN_ONCE alway return true in that case.
> Are you sure it does that always?
>
WARN_ONCE will alway return true if its condition is true.:-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists