linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split rk3399-roc-pc for with and without mezzanine board.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 22:48:38 +0530
From:   Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split rk3399-roc-pc for with and
 without mezzanine board.

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 10:24 PM Markus Reichl <m.reichl@...etechno.de> wrote:
>
> For rk3399-roc-pc is a mezzanine board available that carries M.2 and
> POE interfaces. Use it with a separate dts.

Thanks for the patch. Indeed have an impression to go this via overlay
rather than a separate dts since it is HAT for base board, does it
make sense? or is this the way it is handling in rockchip dts files?