linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 06/11] pipe: Advance tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:34:57 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, raven@...maw.net,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, dhowells@...hat.com,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 06/11] pipe: Advance tail pointer inside of wait
 spinlock in pipe_read() [ver #3]

Advance the pipe ring tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe_read()
so that the pipe can be written into with kernel notifications from
contexts where pipe->mutex cannot be taken.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 fs/pipe.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 69afeab8a73a..ea134f69a292 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -325,9 +325,14 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 
 			if (!buf->len) {
 				pipe_buf_release(pipe, buf);
+				spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
 				tail++;
 				pipe->tail = tail;
-				do_wakeup = 1;
+				do_wakeup = 0;
+				wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
+					&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
+				spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
+				kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 			}
 			total_len -= chars;
 			if (!total_len)
@@ -359,6 +364,7 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 		if (do_wakeup) {
 			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
  			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
+			do_wakeup = 0;
 		}
 		pipe_wait(pipe);
 	}