[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157262974145.13142.5910403713310791673.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:35:41 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, raven@...maw.net,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, dhowells@...hat.com,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/11] pipe: Increase the writer-wakeup threshold to
reduce context-switch count [ver #3]
Increase the threshold at which the reader sends a wake event to the
writers in the queue such that the queue must be half empty before the wake
is issued rather than the wake being issued when just a single slot
available.
This reduces the number of context switches in the tests significantly,
without altering the amount of work achieved. With my pipe-bench program,
there's a 20% reduction versus an unpatched kernel.
Suggested-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/pipe.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index aba2455caabe..9cd5cbef9552 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -324,16 +324,18 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
}
if (!buf->len) {
+ bool wake;
pipe_buf_release(pipe, buf);
spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
tail++;
pipe->tail = tail;
do_wakeup = 1;
- if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+ wake = head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage / 2;
+ if (wake)
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
- if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+ if (wake)
kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
}
total_len -= chars;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists