linux-kernel - [PATCH] drivers/hv: Replace binary semaphore with mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191101200004.20318-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date:   Fri,  1 Nov 2019 13:00:04 -0700
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        sashal@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        dave@...olabs.net, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/hv: Replace binary semaphore with mutex

At a slight footprint cost (24 vs 32 bytes), mutexes are more optimal
than semaphores; it's also a nicer interface for mutual exclusion,
which is why they are encouraged over binary semaphores, when possible.

Replace the hyperv_mmio_lock, its semantics implies traditional lock
ownership; that is, the lock owner is the same for both lock/unlock
operations. Therefore it is safe to convert.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
This is part of reducing the amount of semaphore users in the kernel.
Compile-tested only.

 drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
index 391f0b225c9a..5c606dc4a3f7 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static struct notifier_block hyperv_panic_block = {
 static const char *fb_mmio_name = "fb_range";
 static struct resource *fb_mmio;
 static struct resource *hyperv_mmio;
-static DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(hyperv_mmio_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(hyperv_mmio_lock);
 
 static int vmbus_exists(void)
 {
@@ -2011,7 +2011,7 @@ int vmbus_allocate_mmio(struct resource **new, struct hv_device *device_obj,
 	int retval;
 
 	retval = -ENXIO;
-	down(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * If overlaps with frame buffers are allowed, then first attempt to
@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ int vmbus_allocate_mmio(struct resource **new, struct hv_device *device_obj,
 	}
 
 exit:
-	up(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
 	return retval;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vmbus_allocate_mmio);
@@ -2075,7 +2075,7 @@ void vmbus_free_mmio(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
 {
 	struct resource *iter;
 
-	down(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
 	for (iter = hyperv_mmio; iter; iter = iter->sibling) {
 		if ((iter->start >= start + size) || (iter->end <= start))
 			continue;
@@ -2083,7 +2083,7 @@ void vmbus_free_mmio(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
 		__release_region(iter, start, size);
 	}
 	release_mem_region(start, size);
-	up(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&hyperv_mmio_lock);
 
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vmbus_free_mmio);
-- 
2.16.4