linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v3 6/7] doc: keys: Document usage of TEE based Trusted Keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191101201957.GA8369@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 22:19:57 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>, dhowells@...hat.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
        Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@...il.com>,
        "open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 6/7] doc: keys: Document usage of TEE based Trusted
 Keys

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:04:18PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
 
> Isn't this statement contradicting with your earlier statement
> regarding the right order would be to complete TEE patches review
> first and then come up with documentation here [2]?
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1568025601.4614.253.camel@linux.ibm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20190909163643.qxmzpcggi567hmhv@linux.intel.com/

With the intersecting issues, namely key generation and conflicting
keyctl parameters, that was not a well considered statement.

/Jarkko