[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191101211908.GA20672@amt.cnet>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:19:11 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpuidle-haltpoll: add a check to ensure grow start
value is nonzero
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:23:58AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> dev->poll_limit_ns could be zeroed in certain cases (e.g. by
> guest_halt_poll_shrink). If guest_halt_poll_grow_start is zero,
> dev->poll_limit_ns will never be larger than zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I would rather disallow setting grow_start to zero rather
than silently setting it to one on the back of the user.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists