[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=X3o3JKye8pZZckEtk=9XNoajf-Kj8XGUemut7NS2bZjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 15:53:26 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, masneyb@...tation.org,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/15] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add __func__ identifier
to debug statements
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:38 AM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Printing the function name when enabling debugging makes logs easier to
> read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Obviously my opinion doesn't trump maintainers ones, but I have always
heard that this is the wrong thing to do for "dev_xxx" debug
statements. Specifically:
* For "dev_xxx" statements, the device name is already printed which
is pretty good for getting you to the right driver.
* Once you're in the right driver, error messages should be unique
enough to find the right function.
If having __func__ in all messages was beneficial then the "dev_xxx"
macros would include it by default. They don't and such things just
uglify the logs and chew up log space. I suppose you could try
including a CONFIG option to add it to all "dev_xxx" functions and see
if it would be accepted? Then you can turn it on locally.
Using __func__ in cases where you don't happen to have a "struct
device" (and can't get one easily) makes some sense, but otherwise I
believe it should be kept out.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists