lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 2 Nov 2019 18:55:36 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: sysctl: make drop_caches write-only

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 12:35:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:29:20 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > > Either change is an upgrade from the current situation, at least. I prefer 
> > > towards whatever makes the API the least confusing, which appears to be 
> > > Johannes' original change, but I'd support a patch which always set it to 
> > > 0 instead if it was deemed safer.
> > 
> > On the other hand..  As I mentioned earlier, if someone's code is
> > failing because of the permissions change, they can chmod
> > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches at boot time and be happy.  They have no such
> > workaround if their software misbehaves due to a read always returning
> > "0".
> 
> I lied.  I can chmod things in /proc but I can't chmod things in
> /proc/sys/vm.  Huh, why did we do that?

To conserve memory! It was in 2007.
For the record I support 0200 on vm.drop_caches.

	commit 77b14db502cb85a031fe8fde6c85d52f3e0acb63
	[PATCH] sysctl: reimplement the sysctl proc support

	+static int proc_sys_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
	+{
	+       struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
	+       int error;
	+
	+       if (attr->ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID))
	+               return -EPERM;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ