[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191103052243.GF2695@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 10:52:43 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] soundwire: add enumeration_complete structure
On 23-10-19, 16:06, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> We need an async mechanism to prevent access to Slaves that are not
> fully-enumerated.
>
> init_completion() will be invoked when the Slave becomes UNATTACHED,
> and complete() will be invoked when the state become ATTACHED. Any
> read/write before this status change will be delayed with a
> wait_for_completion().
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> index a381a596212b..1381edfaa206 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> @@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ struct sdw_slave {
> u16 dev_num;
> bool probed;
> struct completion probe_complete;
> + struct completion enumeration_complete;
Which series/patch uses this..?
Thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists