linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/topology, cpuset: Account for housekeeping CPUs to avoid empty cpumasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <845e4aba-eee2-efd0-2902-1d956057059d@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 00:37:15 +0000
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        lizefan@...wei.com, tj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        qperret@...gle.com,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology, cpuset: Account for housekeeping CPUs to
 avoid empty cpumasks

On 03/11/2019 19:09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> This patch doesn't apply cleanly to Linus's latest tree - which tree is 
> this against?
> 

This was against Linus' tree at the time (31408fbe33d1), but my local .patch
doesn't apply either. I regenerated a fresh one and there's an off-by-one in
original chunk size - I suspect my editor trying to be smart when I edited
the changelog.

I'll look into preventing this from happening again, in the meantime I'll
send an apply-able version. Apologies for that mess.

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
>