| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20191104212128.604497481@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:43:18 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 005/149] Btrfs: fix memory leak due to concurrent append writes with fiemap
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
[ Upstream commit c67d970f0ea8dcc423e112137d34334fa0abb8ec ]
When we have a buffered write that starts at an offset greater than or
equals to the file's size happening concurrently with a full ranged
fiemap, we can end up leaking an extent state structure.
Suppose we have a file with a size of 1Mb, and before the buffered write
and fiemap are performed, it has a single extent state in its io tree
representing the range from 0 to 1Mb, with the EXTENT_DELALLOC bit set.
The following sequence diagram shows how the memory leak happens if a
fiemap a buffered write, starting at offset 1Mb and with a length of
4Kb, are performed concurrently.
CPU 1 CPU 2
extent_fiemap()
--> it's a full ranged fiemap
range from 0 to LLONG_MAX - 1
(9223372036854775807)
--> locks range in the inode's
io tree
--> after this we have 2 extent
states in the io tree:
--> 1 for range [0, 1Mb[ with
the bits EXTENT_LOCKED and
EXTENT_DELALLOC_BITS set
--> 1 for the range
[1Mb, LLONG_MAX[ with
the EXTENT_LOCKED bit set
--> start buffered write at offset
1Mb with a length of 4Kb
btrfs_file_write_iter()
btrfs_buffered_write()
--> cached_state is NULL
lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need()
--> returns 0 and does not lock
range because it starts
at current i_size / eof
--> cached_state remains NULL
btrfs_dirty_pages()
btrfs_set_extent_delalloc()
(...)
__set_extent_bit()
--> splits extent state for range
[1Mb, LLONG_MAX[ and now we
have 2 extent states:
--> one for the range
[1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[ with
EXTENT_LOCKED set
--> another one for the range
[1Mb + 4Kb, LLONG_MAX[ with
EXTENT_LOCKED set as well
--> sets EXTENT_DELALLOC on the
extent state for the range
[1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[
--> caches extent state
[1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[ into
@cached_state because it has
the bit EXTENT_LOCKED set
--> btrfs_buffered_write() ends up
with a non-NULL cached_state and
never calls anything to release its
reference on it, resulting in a
memory leak
Fix this by calling free_extent_state() on cached_state if the range was
not locked by lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need().
The same issue can happen if anything else other than fiemap locks a range
that covers eof and beyond.
This could be triggered, sporadically, by test case generic/561 from the
fstests suite, which makes duperemove run concurrently with fsstress, and
duperemove does plenty of calls to fiemap. When CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is set
the leak is reported in dmesg/syslog when removing the btrfs module with
a message like the following:
[77100.039461] BTRFS: state leak: start 6574080 end 6582271 state 16402 in tree 0 refs 1
Otherwise (CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG not set) detectable with kmemleak.
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.16+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 4870440d6424a..5d036b794e4af 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1591,7 +1591,6 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
struct page **pages = NULL;
- struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
struct extent_changeset *data_reserved = NULL;
u64 release_bytes = 0;
u64 lockstart;
@@ -1612,6 +1611,7 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
while (iov_iter_count(i) > 0) {
size_t offset = pos & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
+ struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
size_t sector_offset;
size_t write_bytes = min(iov_iter_count(i),
nrptrs * (size_t)PAGE_SIZE -
@@ -1758,9 +1758,20 @@ again:
if (copied > 0)
ret = btrfs_dirty_pages(inode, pages, dirty_pages,
pos, copied, &cached_state);
+
+ /*
+ * If we have not locked the extent range, because the range's
+ * start offset is >= i_size, we might still have a non-NULL
+ * cached extent state, acquired while marking the extent range
+ * as delalloc through btrfs_dirty_pages(). Therefore free any
+ * possible cached extent state to avoid a memory leak.
+ */
if (extents_locked)
unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree,
lockstart, lockend, &cached_state);
+ else
+ free_extent_state(cached_state);
+
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), reserve_bytes,
true);
if (ret) {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists