linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: cpu_cooling: Reorder the header file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHLCerO6eN6qXRS9Mdz4TwVTH9_dF5eiWqqWkcW+5+PFF_WwzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:51:33 +0530
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        "open list:THERMAL/CPU_COOLING" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: cpu_cooling: Reorder the header file

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:41 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> As the conditions are simplified and unified, it is useless to have
> different blocks of definitions under the same compiler condition,
> let's merge the blocks.
>
> There is no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>

> ---
>  include/linux/cpu_cooling.h | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> index 72d1c9c5e538..b74732535e4b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,13 @@ cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>   */
>  void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev);
>
> +/**
> + * of_cpufreq_cooling_register - create cpufreq cooling device based on DT.
> + * @policy: cpufreq policy.
> + */
> +struct thermal_cooling_device *
> +of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> +
>  #else /* !CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL */
>  static inline struct thermal_cooling_device *
>  cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> @@ -45,16 +52,7 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
>  {
>         return;
>  }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL */
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL
> -/**
> - * of_cpufreq_cooling_register - create cpufreq cooling device based on DT.
> - * @policy: cpufreq policy.
> - */
> -struct thermal_cooling_device *
> -of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> -#else
>  static inline struct thermal_cooling_device *
>  of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
> --
> 2.17.1
>