linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.3 011/163] perf script brstackinsn: Fix recovery from LBR/binary mismatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  4 Nov 2019 22:43:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 011/163] perf script brstackinsn: Fix recovery from LBR/binary mismatch

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit e98df280bc2a499fd41d7f9e2d6733884de69902 ]

When the LBR data and the instructions in a binary do not match the loop
printing instructions could get confused and print a long stream of
bogus <bad> instructions.

The problem was that if the instruction decoder cannot decode an
instruction it ilen wasn't initialized, so the loop going through the
basic block would continue with the previous value.

Harden the code to avoid such problems:

- Make sure ilen is always freshly initialized and is 0 for bad
  instructions.

- Do not overrun the code buffer while printing instructions

- Print a warning message if the final jump is not on an instruction
  boundary.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190927233546.11533-1-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
index 0140ddb8dd0bd..c14a1cdad80c0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
 			continue;
 
 		insn = 0;
-		for (off = 0;; off += ilen) {
+		for (off = 0; off < (unsigned)len; off += ilen) {
 			uint64_t ip = start + off;
 
 			printed += ip__fprintf_sym(ip, thread, x.cpumode, x.cpu, &lastsym, attr, fp);
@@ -1065,6 +1065,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
 					printed += print_srccode(thread, x.cpumode, ip);
 				break;
 			} else {
+				ilen = 0;
 				printed += fprintf(fp, "\t%016" PRIx64 "\t%s\n", ip,
 						   dump_insn(&x, ip, buffer + off, len - off, &ilen));
 				if (ilen == 0)
@@ -1074,6 +1075,8 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
 				insn++;
 			}
 		}
+		if (off != (unsigned)len)
+			printed += fprintf(fp, "\tmismatch of LBR data and executable\n");
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1114,6 +1117,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
 		goto out;
 	}
 	for (off = 0; off <= end - start; off += ilen) {
+		ilen = 0;
 		printed += fprintf(fp, "\t%016" PRIx64 "\t%s\n", start + off,
 				   dump_insn(&x, start + off, buffer + off, len - off, &ilen));
 		if (ilen == 0)
-- 
2.20.1