[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191104212152.049781479@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:45:52 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 162/163] RDMA/mlx5: Use irq xarray locking for mkey_table
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
[ Upstream commit 1524b12a6e02a85264af4ed208b034a2239ef374 ]
The mkey_table xarray is touched by the reg_mr_callback() function which
is called from a hard irq. Thus all other uses of xa_lock must use the
_irq variants.
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.4.0-rc1 #12 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
python3/343 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffff888182be1d40 (&(&xa->xa_lock)->rlock#3){?.-.}, at: xa_erase+0x12/0x30
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire+0xe1/0x200
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x35/0x50
reg_mr_callback+0x2dd/0x450 [mlx5_ib]
mlx5_cmd_exec_cb_handler+0x2c/0x70 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_cmd_comp_handler+0x355/0x840 [mlx5_core]
[..]
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(&xa->xa_lock)->rlock#3);
<Interrupt>
lock(&(&xa->xa_lock)->rlock#3);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by python3/343:
#0: ffff88818eb4bd38 (&uverbs_dev->disassociate_srcu){....}, at: ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xe5/0x1e0 [ib_uverbs]
#1: ffff888176c76d38 (&file->hw_destroy_rwsem){++++}, at: uobj_destroy+0x2d/0x90 [ib_uverbs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 343 Comm: python3 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc1 #12
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x86/0xca
print_usage_bug.cold.50+0x2e5/0x355
mark_lock+0x871/0xb50
? match_held_lock+0x20/0x250
? check_usage_forwards+0x240/0x240
__lock_acquire+0x7de/0x23a0
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? mark_lock+0xae/0xb50
? mark_held_locks+0xb0/0xb0
? find_held_lock+0xca/0xf0
lock_acquire+0xe1/0x200
? xa_erase+0x12/0x30
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
? xa_erase+0x12/0x30
xa_erase+0x12/0x30
mlx5_ib_dealloc_mw+0x55/0xa0 [mlx5_ib]
uverbs_dealloc_mw+0x3c/0x70 [ib_uverbs]
uverbs_free_mw+0x1a/0x20 [ib_uverbs]
destroy_hw_idr_uobject+0x49/0xa0 [ib_uverbs]
[..]
Fixes: 0417791536ae ("RDMA/mlx5: Add missing synchronize_srcu() for MW cases")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191024234910.GA9038@ziepe.ca
Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
index c15d05f61cc7b..a6198fe7f3768 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
@@ -1975,8 +1975,8 @@ int mlx5_ib_dealloc_mw(struct ib_mw *mw)
int err;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING)) {
- xa_erase(&dev->mdev->priv.mkey_table,
- mlx5_base_mkey(mmw->mmkey.key));
+ xa_erase_irq(&dev->mdev->priv.mkey_table,
+ mlx5_base_mkey(mmw->mmkey.key));
/*
* pagefault_single_data_segment() may be accessing mmw under
* SRCU if the user bound an ODP MR to this MW.
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists