lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191104212146.842453698@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  4 Nov 2019 22:44:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 092/163] thunderbolt: Correct path indices for PCIe tunnel

From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit ce19f91eae43e39d5a1da55344756ab5a3c7e8d1 ]

PCIe tunnel path indices got mixed up when we added support for tunnels
between switches that are not adjacent. This did not affect the
functionality as it is just an index but fix it now nevertheless to make
the code easier to understand.

Reported-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>
Fixes: 8c7acaaf020f ("thunderbolt: Extend tunnel creation to more than 2 adjacent switches")
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c
index 31d0234837e45..5a99234826e73 100644
--- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c
+++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ struct tb_tunnel *tb_tunnel_alloc_pci(struct tb *tb, struct tb_port *up,
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	tb_pci_init_path(path);
-	tunnel->paths[TB_PCI_PATH_UP] = path;
+	tunnel->paths[TB_PCI_PATH_DOWN] = path;
 
 	path = tb_path_alloc(tb, up, TB_PCI_HOPID, down, TB_PCI_HOPID, 0,
 			     "PCIe Up");
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ struct tb_tunnel *tb_tunnel_alloc_pci(struct tb *tb, struct tb_port *up,
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	tb_pci_init_path(path);
-	tunnel->paths[TB_PCI_PATH_DOWN] = path;
+	tunnel->paths[TB_PCI_PATH_UP] = path;
 
 	return tunnel;
 }
-- 
2.20.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ