linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 58/62] xfs: Correctly invert xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191104211959.290977993@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  4 Nov 2019 22:45:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Vratislav Bendel <vbendel@...hat.com>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Alex Lyakas <alex@...ara.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 58/62] xfs: Correctly invert xfs_buftarg LRU isolation logic

From: Vratislav Bendel <vbendel@...hat.com>

commit 19957a181608d25c8f4136652d0ea00b3738972d upstream.

Due to an inverted logic mistake in xfs_buftarg_isolate()
the xfs_buffers with zero b_lru_ref will take another trip
around LRU, while isolating buffers with non-zero b_lru_ref.

Additionally those isolated buffers end up right back on the LRU
once they are released, because b_lru_ref remains elevated.

Fix that circuitous route by leaving them on the LRU
as originally intended.

Signed-off-by: Vratislav Bendel <vbendel@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Lyakas <alex@...ara.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1674,7 +1674,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_isolate(
 	 * zero. If the value is already zero, we need to reclaim the
 	 * buffer, otherwise it gets another trip through the LRU.
 	 */
-	if (!atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
+	if (atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
 		spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock);
 		return LRU_ROTATE;
 	}