[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3e7oG5NMPbhgQOoKvB0Z5ui0iAHHFqyAxy87Nd903Vmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:11:51 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] mm: remove __ARCH_HAS_4LEVEL_HACK and include/asm-generic/4level-fixup.h
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:58 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> There are no architectures that use include/asm-generic/4level-fixup.h
> therefore it can be removed along with __ARCH_HAS_4LEVEL_HACK define.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
For asm-generic:
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Have you discussed how the series should get merged? I assume an initial
set of patches can just go through architecture maintainer trees, but
whatever patches don't get picked up that way would go through either
Andrew's -mm tree (for memory management) or my asm-generic tree
(for cross-architecture cleanups).
Since there is still at least one regression, I expect not to do anything
for now. Please let me know when/if you expect me to merge the
remaining patches.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists