linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 08/10] autonuma, memory tiering: Select hotter pages to promote to fast memory node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 04 Nov 2019 18:13:21 +0800
From:   "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/10] autonuma, memory tiering: Select hotter pages to promote to fast memory node

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:41:10AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>
>> >> +#define NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST	16
>> >> +		int numa_scan_idx;
>> >> +		unsigned long numa_scan_jiffies[NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST];
>> >> +		unsigned long numa_scan_starts[NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST];
>> >
>> > Why 16? This is 4 cachelines.
>> 
>> We want to keep the NUMA scanning history reasonably long.  From
>> task_scan_min(), the minimal interval between task_numa_work() running
>> is about 100 ms by default.  So we can keep 1600 ms history by default
>> if NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST is 16.  If user choose to use smaller
>> sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size, then we can only keep shorter history.
>> In general, we want to keep no less than 1000 ms history.  So 16 appears
>> like a reasonable choice for us.  Any other suggestion?
>
> This is very good information for Changelogs and comments :-)

Thanks!  Will do this in the next version.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying