linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] kvm: svm: Enable UMIP feature on AMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37c61050-e315-fc84-9699-bb92e5afacda@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:54:00 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        "jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc:     "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "zohar@...ux.ibm.com" <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "nayna@...ux.ibm.com" <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kvm: svm: Enable UMIP feature on AMD

On 01/11/19 18:33, Moger, Babu wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 4153ca8cddb7..79abbdeca148 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -2533,6 +2533,11 @@ static void svm_decache_cr4_guest_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static bool svm_umip_emulated(void)
> +{
> +	return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_UMIP);
> +}

For hardware that supports UMIP, this is only needed because of your
patch 1.  Without it, X86_FEATURE_UMIP should already be enabled on
processors that natively support UMIP.

If you want UMIP *emulation* instead, this should become "return true".

>  static void update_cr0_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  {
>  	ulong gcr0 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr0;
> @@ -4438,6 +4443,13 @@ static int interrupt_window_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static int umip_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
> +
> +	return kvm_emulate_instruction(vcpu, 0);
> +}
> +
>  static int pause_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
> @@ -4775,6 +4787,10 @@ static int (*const svm_exit_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
>  	[SVM_EXIT_SMI]				= nop_on_interception,
>  	[SVM_EXIT_INIT]				= nop_on_interception,
>  	[SVM_EXIT_VINTR]			= interrupt_window_interception,
> +	[SVM_EXIT_IDTR_READ]			= umip_interception,
> +	[SVM_EXIT_GDTR_READ]			= umip_interception,
> +	[SVM_EXIT_LDTR_READ]			= umip_interception,
> +	[SVM_EXIT_TR_READ]			= umip_interception,

This is missing enabling the intercepts.  Also, this can be just
emulate_on_interception instead of a new function.

Paolo

>  	[SVM_EXIT_RDPMC]			= rdpmc_interception,
>  	[SVM_EXIT_CPUID]			= cpuid_interception,
>  	[SVM_EXIT_IRET]                         = iret_interception,
> @@ -5976,11 +5992,6 @@ static bool svm_xsaves_supported(void)
>  	return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
>  }
>  
> -static bool svm_umip_emulated(void)
> -{
> -	return false;
> -}
> -
>  static bool svm_pt_supported(void)
>  {
>  	return false;
>