linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] libfdt: add SPDX-License-Identifier to libfdt wrappers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 08:00:14 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libfdt: add SPDX-License-Identifier to libfdt wrappers

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 1:19 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> These are kernel source code even though they are just two-line wrappers.
>
> Files without explicit license information fall back to GPL-2.0-only,
> which is the project default.

That is true and these are kernel only files, but given they are just
a wrapper around the .c files, maybe they should have the same
license?

Rob