[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1977598237.90293761.1572878080625.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:34:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Marta Rybczynska <mrybczyn@...ray.eu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Charles Machalow <csm10495@...il.com>,
linux-nvme <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
kbusch <kbusch@...nel.org>, axboe <axboe@...com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: change nvme_passthru_cmd64's result field.
----- On 31 Oct, 2019, at 14:39, Christoph Hellwig hch@....de wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:03:38PM -0700, Charles Machalow wrote:
>> Changing nvme_passthru_cmd64's result field to be backwards compatible
>> with the nvme_passthru_cmd/nvme_admin_cmd struct in terms of the result
>> field. With this change the first 32 bits of result in either case
>> point to CQE DW0. This allows userspace tools to use the new structure
>> when using the old ADMIN/IO_CMD ioctls or new ADMIN/IO_CMD64 ioctls.
>
> All that casting is a pretty bad idea. please just add an explicit
> reserved field before the result, and check that it always is zero
> in the ioctl handler.
That would change the size of a structure in UAPI, won't it?
I wanted to avoid it when adding the *64 ioctls and that's why
I added separate ones instead of extending the ones that exist.
Marta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists