[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDeMevgn0JFxjzUWhp4dS10T2MQSA9P82nOGX73xUjXoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:54:50 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not set skip buddy up the sched hierarchy
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 19:45, Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
>
> Setting skip buddy all the way up the hierarchy does not play well
> with intra-cgroup yield. One typical usecase of yield is when a
> thread in a cgroup wants to yield CPU to another thread within the
> same cgroup. For such a case, setting the skip buddy all the way up
> the hierarchy is counter-productive, as that results in CPU being
> yielded to a task in some other cgroup.
>
> So, limit the skip effect only to the task requesting it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 682a754ea3e1..52ab06585d7f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6647,8 +6647,15 @@ static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)
>
> static void set_skip_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> - for_each_sched_entity(se)
> - cfs_rq_of(se)->skip = se;
> + /*
> + * One typical usecase of yield is when a thread in a cgroup
> + * wants to yield CPU to another thread within the same cgroup.
> + * For such a case, setting the skip buddy all the way up the
> + * hierarchy is counter-productive, as that results in CPU being
> + * yielded to a task in some other cgroup. So, only set skip
> + * for the task requesting it.
> + */
> + cfs_rq_of(se)->skip = se;
> }
You should also update __clear_buddies_skip to only clear this skip
>
> /*
> --
> 2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists