lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc30ed89-6581-d99d-03bb-58ea40b74a3d@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:29:21 +0100
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:     Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, ionela.voinescu@....com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        edubezval@...il.com, qperret@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
        javi.merino@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/6] sched: Add infrastructure to store and update
 instantaneous thermal pressure

On 01/11/2019 21:57, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> On 11/01/2019 08:17 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 22.10.19 22:34, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * trigger_thermal_pressure_average: Trigger the thermal pressure accumulate
>>> + *				     and average algorithm
>>> + */
>>> +void trigger_thermal_pressure_average(struct rq *rq)
>>> +{
>>> +	update_thermal_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq,
>>> +				per_cpu(delta_capacity, cpu_of(rq)));
>>> +}
>>
>> Why not call update_thermal_load_avg() directly in fair.c? We do this for all
>> the other update_foo_load_avg() functions (foo eq. irq, rt_rq, dl_rq ...)
> thermal.c is going away in next version and I am moving everything to
> fair.c. So this is taken care of
> 
>>
>> You don't have to pass 'u64 now', so you can hide it plus the 
> 
> You still need now.All the update_*_avg apis take now as a parameter.

You do need it for the ___update_load_sum() call inside the
foo_load_avg() functions. But that doesn't mean you have to pass it into
foo_load_avg(). Look at update_irq_load_avg() for example. We don't pass
rq->clock as now in there.

-int update_thermal_load_avg(u64 now, struct rq *rq, u64 capacity)
+extern int sched_thermal_decay_coeff;
+
+int update_thermal_load_avg(struct rq *rq, u64 capacity)
 {
+       u64 now = rq_clock_task(rq) >> sched_thermal_decay_coeff;
+
        if (___update_load_sum(now, &rq->avg_thermal,
                               capacity,
                               capacity,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ