[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19998571b6704752955e3c951b50eb92@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:19:58 +0000
From: "Bowers, AndrewX" <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
To: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: fix potential infinite loop
because loop counter being too small
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org] On
> Behalf Of Colin King
> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2019 7:00 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>; David S . Miller
> <davem@...emloft.net>; Venkataramanan, Anirudh
> <anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: fix potential infinite loop because loop
> counter being too small
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently the for-loop counter i is a u8 however it is being checked against a
> maximum value hw->num_tx_sched_layers which is a u16. Hence there is a
> potential wrap-around of counter i back to zero if
> hw->num_tx_sched_layers is greater than 255. Fix this by making i
> a u16.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Infinite loop")
> Fixes: b36c598c999c ("ice: Updates to Tx scheduler code")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists