linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86, mce, therm_throt: Optimize notifications of thermal throttle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:56:17 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     tony.luck@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, bberg@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hdegoede@...hat.com, ckellner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86, mce, therm_throt: Optimize notifications of
 thermal throttle

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 12:36:32PM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > That wants to be a bool judging by the context it is used in.
> I can change to bool, just didn't use it
> https://yarchive.net/comp/linux/bool.html

And are you using it in a union or where the size of bool - which is
implementation-specific - plays any role, esp. in your particular use
case?

> They are architectural MSRs and the fact that we are getting called
> means that they are enabled by looking at CPUID bits.

If the CPUID bits guarantees their presence, then the error handling is
not absolutely necessary.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette