[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PU1P153MB01695CEE940C4511E3254ADCBF7E0@PU1P153MB0169.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 05:18:24 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: "dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Input: hyperv-keyboard: Add the support of hibernation
> From: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 10:46 AM
> To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:44:04AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > ...
> > I think I understood now: it looks the vmbus driver should implement
> > a prepare() or freeze(), which calls the hyperv_keyboard driver's
> > prepare() or freeze(), which can set the flag or disable the keyboard
> > event handling. This way we don't need the notifier.
>
> Right. I think in practice the current suspend implementation can work
> as freeze() for the HV keyboard, because in suspend you shut off vmbus
> channel, so there should not be wakeup signals anymore. What you do not
> want is to have the current resume to be used in place of thaw(), as
> there you re-enable the vmbus channel and resume sending wakeup requests
> as you are writing out the hibernation image to storage.
>
> I think if vmbus allowed HV keyboard driver to supply empty thaw() and
> poweroff() implementations, while using suspend() as freeze() and
> resume() as restore(), it would solve the issue for you.
>
> Dmitry
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for the late reply! I finally came back on this patch. :-)
After I dug more into the issues, this is my understanding now:
As I checked the code in drivers/ , it doesn't look commom for a driver to
distinguish between thaw() and restore(). Typically a driver uses the macro
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() to define the dev_pm_ops, and the macro uses the
same function resume_fn as thaw() and restore().
BTW, the macro already uses the same function suspend_fn as suspend() and
freeze(), and uses the same function resume_fn as resume() and restore(). And,
it looks unusual for a driver to provide an empty thaw(), if any. If I follow your
suggestions, I'll have to fix the vmbus driver first (i.e. drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c:
vmbus_pm()) by manually assigning a new function vmbus_thaw() to the
thaw() dev_pm_op, and vmbus_thaw() should call the Hyper-V keyboard
driver's empty hv_kbd_thaw(), meaning I have to add a .thaw function
pointer to the struct hv_driver. IMHO all these changes look too big just for
the rare corner cases of the unexpected wake-up issues.
More important, even if we make the suggested changes, we actually only fix
the unexpected wakeup caused by PMSG_THAW , and there are still some corner
cases of failures (please see below).
Before any of the dev_pm_op is called, the global counter 'pm_abort_suspend'
can be already non-zero, meaning pm_wakeup_pending() is true, so
try_to_freeze_tasks() returns -EBUSY, i.e. hibernate() -> freeze_processes()
or hibernate() -> hibernation_snapshot() -> freeze_kernel_threads() fails.
When the VM boots up and tries to resume from the saved file from
disk, before the fresh new kernel's Hyper-V keyboard device is PMSG_QUIESCE'ed,
the global counter 'pm_abort_suspend' can be already non-zero (I can cause this
scenario by holding the Enter key when the kernel starts), so
pm_wakeup_pending() is true, and the below freeze_processes() or
device_suspend() can return -EBUSY and the resume process fails.
software_resume() ->
freeze_processes()
pm_wakeup_clear(true) -> Note: this resets the counter to 0.
try_to_freeze_tasks ->
pm_wakeup_pending
load_image_and_restore() ->
hibernation_restore() ->
dpm_suspend_start() ->
dpm_suspend() ->
device_suspend() ->
__device_suspend() ->
pm_wakeup_pending()
IMO on a Linux physical machine these issues should happen as well. I think
we can fix them separately. For this patch, I suggest we keep it simple like
the below:
[PATCH v2] Input: hyperv-keyboard: Add the support of hibernation
During the suspend process and resume process, if there is any keyboard
event, there is a small chance the suspend and the resume process can be
aborted because of hv_kbd_on_receive() -> pm_wakeup_hard_event().
This behavior can be avoided by disabling the Hyper-V keyboard device as
a wakeup source:
echo disabled > /sys/bus/vmbus/drivers/hyperv_keyboard/XXX/power/wakeup
(XXX is the device's GUID).
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
---
drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c b/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c
index e486a8a74c40..df4e9f6f4529 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/hyperv-keyboard.c
@@ -259,6 +259,8 @@ static int hv_kbd_connect_to_vsp(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
u32 proto_status;
int error;
+ reinit_completion(&kbd_dev->wait_event);
+
request = &kbd_dev->protocol_req;
memset(request, 0, sizeof(struct synth_kbd_protocol_request));
request->header.type = __cpu_to_le32(SYNTH_KBD_PROTOCOL_REQUEST);
@@ -380,6 +382,29 @@ static int hv_kbd_remove(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
return 0;
}
+static int hv_kbd_suspend(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
+{
+ vmbus_close(hv_dev->channel);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int hv_kbd_resume(struct hv_device *hv_dev)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = vmbus_open(hv_dev->channel,
+ KBD_VSC_SEND_RING_BUFFER_SIZE,
+ KBD_VSC_RECV_RING_BUFFER_SIZE,
+ NULL, 0,
+ hv_kbd_on_channel_callback,
+ hv_dev);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = hv_kbd_connect_to_vsp(hv_dev);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id id_table[] = {
/* Keyboard guid */
{ HV_KBD_GUID, },
@@ -393,6 +418,8 @@ static struct hv_driver hv_kbd_drv = {
.id_table = id_table,
.probe = hv_kbd_probe,
.remove = hv_kbd_remove,
+ .suspend = hv_kbd_suspend,
+ .resume = hv_kbd_resume,
.driver = {
.probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
},
--
I plan to post this as v2.
Looking forward to your comments!
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists