[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191105065000.50407-2-saravanak@google.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:49:58 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] of: property: Minor style clean up of of_link_to_phandle()
Adding a debug log instead of silently ignoring a phandle for an early
device. Also, return the right error code instead of 0 even though the
actual execution flow won't change.
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
---
drivers/of/property.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index e225ab17f598..fbc201330ba0 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -1051,8 +1051,14 @@ static int of_link_to_phandle(struct device *dev, struct device_node *sup_np,
sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(&sup_np->fwnode);
is_populated = of_node_check_flag(sup_np, OF_POPULATED);
of_node_put(sup_np);
- if (!sup_dev)
- return is_populated ? 0 : -EAGAIN;
+ if (!sup_dev && is_populated) {
+ /* Early device without struct device. */
+ dev_dbg(dev, "Not linking to %pOFP - No struct device\n",
+ sup_np);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ } else if (!sup_dev) {
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
if (!device_link_add(dev, sup_dev, dl_flags))
ret = -EAGAIN;
put_device(sup_dev);
--
2.24.0.rc1.363.gb1bccd3e3d-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists