| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1j7e4e4sab.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:54:36 +0100
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Nan Li <Nan.Li@...ogic.com>, Jianxin Pan <Jianxin.Pan@...ogic.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
"linux-amlogic\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mmc\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Victor Wan <victor.wan@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: meson-gx: fix mmc dma operation
On Tue 05 Nov 2019 at 09:30, Nan Li <Nan.Li@...ogic.com> wrote:
>
> Based on Uffe comment I tried something else.
>
> Basically, it enables chained mode in the driver only when the framework
> calls pre/post_req callback. As far as understood, the framework calls
> this when there is more than one request pending ... which seems to be
> when chained mode actually make sense
>
> Jerome, what you are talking about is the system framework problem when you call pre/post_req,
>
> which is not related to the patch I submitted.
>
>
>
> I strongly disagree.
> As far as I understand from your description, the problem was with the
> life cycle of the dma mapping. This is tighly related with pre/post req.
> Just the variable names you have picked clearly show that.
>
>
>
> As you said, pre/post_req is called only when there is data to implement the chained mode,
>
> but it is also possible to cause memory consistency problems,
> resulting in incorrect data.
>
>
>
> The life cycle of the mapping is also taken care of with patch,
> since dma mapping is no longer handled in .request(). IOW the mapping,
> if any, will be released after the request is done using .post_req()
>
> If you think otherwise, please elaborate.
>
>
> I see what you mean. You want to pull the pre/post_req operation out of the request interface and invoke it at the top.
>
> I didn't notice the following modification of patch in your last email and reply in time. I'm really sorry.
>
> The following patch removes all pre/post_req operations,
No it does not. Callbacks are still provided to the MMC framework.
> but you do not send out the operation patch added to the upper layer
> together.
There is no modification needed in the upper layer
>
> Then the patch is incomplete, which will affect the dma data transfer function in start_cmd function and affect the multi-block write operation.
>
No it is not incomplete. pre and post request are correctly called. You
can check that with ftrace if you want.
Maybe you could try it ?
> Please send your complete patch, including core layer modification,
> thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> Therefore, this patch is added to make memory consistent and obtain real effective information.
>
>
>
> ----8<-----
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> index e712315c7e8d..399604b4124d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> @@ -126,8 +126,7 @@
> #define SD_EMMC_CFG_CMD_GAP 16 /* in clock cycles */
> #define SD_EMMC_DESC_BUF_LEN PAGE_SIZE
>
> -#define SD_EMMC_PRE_REQ_DONE BIT(0)
> -#define SD_EMMC_DESC_CHAIN_MODE BIT(1)
> +#define SD_EMMC_DESC_CHAIN_MODE BIT(0)
>
> #define MUX_CLK_NUM_PARENTS 2
>
> @@ -228,7 +227,6 @@ static void meson_mmc_get_transfer_mode(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> int i;
> - bool use_desc_chain_mode = true;
>
> /*
> * When Controller DMA cannot directly access DDR memory, disable
> @@ -251,12 +249,11 @@ static void meson_mmc_get_transfer_mode(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> /* check for 8 byte alignment */
> if (sg->offset & 7) {
> WARN_ONCE(1, "unaligned scatterlist buffer\n");
> - use_desc_chain_mode = false;
> - break;
> + return;
> }
>
> - if (use_desc_chain_mode)
> - data->host_cookie |= SD_EMMC_DESC_CHAIN_MODE;
> + /* The planets are aligned, let's chain them up */
> + data->host_cookie |= SD_EMMC_DESC_CHAIN_MODE;
> }
>
> static inline bool meson_mmc_desc_chain_mode(const struct mmc_data *data)
> @@ -278,7 +275,6 @@ static void meson_mmc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> return;
>
> meson_mmc_get_transfer_mode(mmc, mrq);
> - data->host_cookie |= SD_EMMC_PRE_REQ_DONE;
>
> if (!meson_mmc_desc_chain_mode(data))
> return;
> @@ -803,25 +799,11 @@ static void meson_mmc_start_cmd(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> static void meson_mmc_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> {
> struct meson_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> - bool needs_pre_post_req = mrq->data &&
> - !(mrq->data->host_cookie & SD_EMMC_PRE_REQ_DONE);
> -
> - if (needs_pre_post_req) {
> - meson_mmc_get_transfer_mode(mmc, mrq);
> - if (!meson_mmc_desc_chain_mode(mrq->data))
> - needs_pre_post_req = false;
> - }
> -
> - if (needs_pre_post_req)
> - meson_mmc_pre_req(mmc, mrq);
>
> /* Stop execution */
> writel(0, host->regs + SD_EMMC_START);
>
> meson_mmc_start_cmd(mmc, mrq->sbc ?: mrq->cmd);
> -
> - if (needs_pre_post_req)
> - meson_mmc_post_req(mmc, mrq, 0);
> }
>
> static void meson_mmc_read_resp(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> ---->8-----
>
> No performance hit AFAICT.
> From your description, it should address your problem too.
>
>
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> index e712315..7667e8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ struct meson_host {
> int irq;
>
> bool vqmmc_enabled;
> + bool needs_pre_post_req;
> };
>
> #define CMD_CFG_LENGTH_MASK GENMASK(8, 0)
> @@ -654,6 +655,8 @@ static void meson_mmc_request_done(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> struct meson_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>
> host->cmd = NULL;
> + if (host->needs_pre_post_req)
> + meson_mmc_post_req(mmc, mrq, 0);
> mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
> }
>
> @@ -803,25 +806,23 @@ static void meson_mmc_start_cmd(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> static void meson_mmc_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> {
> struct meson_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> - bool needs_pre_post_req = mrq->data &&
> +
> + host->needs_pre_post_req = mrq->data &&
> !(mrq->data->host_cookie & SD_EMMC_PRE_REQ_DONE);
>
> - if (needs_pre_post_req) {
> + if (host->needs_pre_post_req) {
> meson_mmc_get_transfer_mode(mmc, mrq);
> if (!meson_mmc_desc_chain_mode(mrq->data))
> - needs_pre_post_req = false;
> + host->needs_pre_post_req = false;
> }
>
> - if (needs_pre_post_req)
> + if (host->needs_pre_post_req)
> meson_mmc_pre_req(mmc, mrq);
>
> /* Stop execution */
> writel(0, host->regs + SD_EMMC_START);
>
> meson_mmc_start_cmd(mmc, mrq->sbc ?: mrq->cmd);
> -
> - if (needs_pre_post_req)
> - meson_mmc_post_req(mmc, mrq, 0);
> }
>
> static void meson_mmc_read_resp(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_command *cmd)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists