[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve6_8dXJgF6c2OdZDeV=icyRondvMKwTxhom-RXDACfUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:08:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: Add Maxim MAX7313 PWM support
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:02 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2019
> 09:06:37 +0200:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:33 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > For me it sounds more likely that PWM is a *pin function* of a pin
> > controller and actually this GPIO driver should be a pin controller
> > with corresponding function(s).
> >
>
> Ok, thanks for the input, I will address Thierry's comments and
> re-submit as a single file (same shape as in v1).
Perhaps I have to be more clear. What I meant is that pin control
should support PWM pin function and PCA953x be converted to a pin
control + GPIO + PWM.
Above definitely is not what you did and it's not for immediate submission.
I really would like to hear if it makes sense.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists