[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191105131203.z4u35op7f6wm3pg2@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:12:03 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock
directly
Hello Clément,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:58:31PM +0100, Clément Péron wrote:
> This series just want to add a new device and a new bypass
> functionality and I can't measure the output of PWM and testing it
> properly.
> Can this be done in another patch/series ?
I'm fine if you implement the bypass stuff with this logic and keep the
other stuff as is.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists