lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHCN7xJ501UHTRRi-fdi7cFH_Bhz07hpa9wRaP1D0MGWrDmbkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:27:15 -0600
From:   Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: ili210x - add ILI2117 support

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:04 PM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 6:40 PM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > I will test it tomorrow on a 2117a and reply with results.  I am very
> > excited to see this integrated.

For the series:  Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> #imx6q-logicpd

adam
> >
>
> I will do the same. That should give us confidence that 211x works
> ok.
>
> Dmitry, should someone retest 251x and 210x after such a significant
> change? Unfortunately I don't have access to these chips.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ