linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] pwm: sun4i: Add an optional probe for reset line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJiuCcesD8kh_BpVLxyhk5UYYwGhp_tQkcsaY-LzxRTT5kO3Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:01:31 +0100
From:   Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <pza@...gutronix.de>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] pwm: sun4i: Add an optional probe for reset line

Hi Philipp,

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 14:36, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 14:14 +0100, Clément Péron wrote:
> > From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> >
> > H6 PWM core needs deasserted reset line in order to work.
> >
> > Add an optional probe for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > index 6f5840a1a82d..9ba83769a478 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> [...]
> > @@ -365,6 +367,21 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk))
> >               return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk);
> >
> > +     pwm->rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(pwm->rst)) {
> > +             if (PTR_ERR(pwm->rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get reset failed %ld\n",
> > +                             PTR_ERR(pwm->rst));
> > +             return PTR_ERR(pwm->rst);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* Deassert reset */
>
> Nitpick: isn't the API function name explanatory enough?

Yes I can remove this comment,

Clément
>
> regards
> Philipp
>