[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff6085af2b949d43571b61c7d4d69743cb175850.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:07:32 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "dmurphy@...com" <dmurphy@...com>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"jacek.anaszewski@...il.com" <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 10/15] regulator: bd71828: Add GPIO based
run-level control for regulators
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 14:24 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:05 AM Vaittinen, Matti
> <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 23:27 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > I do not understand the regulator parts of the patch.
> >
> > I'm sorry. The patch is not clearest one what comes to the
> > regulator
> > stuff. I can try splitting it to smaller and more logical changes
> > if
> > you, Mark or other interested people hope to get it splitted. Or
> > perhaps it would be simplest to review if it was all in one patch?
>
> As long as the regulator experts are happy with the format,
> stay with that. I am just a drive-by coder when it comes to
> regulators.
"Drive-by coder" - I do definitely like how that sounds :] Maybe I can
borrow that. But even the "drive-by" reviewing is hard. And I guess it
should be made as easy as it can...
Br,
Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists