lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dcb9885-3094-88eb-9998-5edb87a3b4bf@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:45:01 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kunit tree

On 11/5/19 2:45 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in:
> 
>    MAINTAINERS
>    lib/Kconfig.debug
>    lib/Makefile
>    lib/list-test.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    ea2dd7c0875e ("lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list")
> 
> from the kunit tree and patch:
> 
>    "lib/list-test.c: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list"
> 
> from the akpm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just assume that these are different versions of the
> same patch, so I just dropped the version in the akpm tree) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 

Right. Andrew and I discussed this patch and he is in the loop that
there is a new version of this patch and that it will be combined
with the Kunit patches in kselftest tree.

Please drop the patch from akpm and carry the fix if necessary.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ