linux-kernel - Re: spdxcheck.py complains about the second OR?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:47:54 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: spdxcheck.py complains about the second OR?

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 02:24:23PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 23:11 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > scripts/spdxcheck.py warns the following two files.
> > > 
> > > $ ./scripts/spdxcheck.py
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_if.h: 1:52 Syntax error: OR
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_regs.h: 1:52 Syntax error: OR
> > > 
> > > I do not understand what is wrong with them.
> > > 
> > > I think "A OR B OR C" is sane.
> > 
> > Yes it is, but obviously we did not expect files with 3 possible
> > alternative licenses.
> 
> Perhaps just this, but the generic logic
> obviously isn't complete.

Can we please print a warning in that case even if we end up parsing
it correct?  tripple licensing always has a bit of a bad smell.