lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191105154754.GA18119@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:47:54 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: spdxcheck.py complains about the second OR?

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 02:24:23PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 23:11 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > scripts/spdxcheck.py warns the following two files.
> > > 
> > > $ ./scripts/spdxcheck.py
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_if.h: 1:52 Syntax error: OR
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_regs.h: 1:52 Syntax error: OR
> > > 
> > > I do not understand what is wrong with them.
> > > 
> > > I think "A OR B OR C" is sane.
> > 
> > Yes it is, but obviously we did not expect files with 3 possible
> > alternative licenses.
> 
> Perhaps just this, but the generic logic
> obviously isn't complete.

Can we please print a warning in that case even if we end up parsing
it correct?  tripple licensing always has a bit of a bad smell.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ