[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191105160943.GA19190@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:09:43 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] PCI: PM: Fold __pci_complete_power_transition() into
its caller
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:32:02AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> if (state > PCI_D3cold)
> @@ -1132,10 +1112,12 @@ int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *
> error = pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, state > PCI_D3hot ?
> PCI_D3hot : state);
>
> - if (!__pci_complete_power_transition(dev, state))
> - error = 0;
> + ret = pci_platform_power_transition(dev, state);
> + /* Powering off a bridge may power off the whole hierarchy */
> + if (!ret && state == PCI_D3cold)
> + pci_bus_set_current_state(dev->subordinate, PCI_D3cold);
>
> - return error;
> + return ret ? error : 0;
Total nitpick, but why not:
if (pci_platform_power_transition(dev, state))
return error;
/* Powering off a bridge may power off the whole hierarchy */
if (state == PCI_D3cold)
pci_bus_set_current_state(dev->subordinate, PCI_D3cold);
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists