lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191105170520.GD28493@bfoster>
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:05:20 -0500
From:   Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/28] xfs: kill background reclaim work

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:46:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> 
> This function is now entirely done by kswapd, so we don't need the
> worker thread to do async reclaim anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 44 --------------------------------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.h |  2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c  |  2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h  |  2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c  | 11 +----------
>  5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index 189cf423fe8f..7e175304e146 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -138,44 +138,6 @@ xfs_inode_free(
>  	__xfs_inode_free(ip);
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Queue a new inode reclaim pass if there are reclaimable inodes and there
> - * isn't a reclaim pass already in progress. By default it runs every 5s based
> - * on the xfs periodic sync default of 30s. Perhaps this should have it's own
> - * tunable, but that can be done if this method proves to be ineffective or too
> - * aggressive.
> - */
> -static void
> -xfs_reclaim_work_queue(
> -	struct xfs_mount        *mp)
> -{
> -
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	if (radix_tree_tagged(&mp->m_perag_tree, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG)) {
> -		queue_delayed_work(mp->m_reclaim_workqueue, &mp->m_reclaim_work,
> -			msecs_to_jiffies(xfs_syncd_centisecs / 6 * 10));
> -	}
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * This is a fast pass over the inode cache to try to get reclaim moving on as
> - * many inodes as possible in a short period of time. It kicks itself every few
> - * seconds, as well as being kicked by the inode cache shrinker when memory
> - * goes low. It scans as quickly as possible avoiding locked inodes or those
> - * already being flushed, and once done schedules a future pass.
> - */
> -void
> -xfs_reclaim_worker(
> -	struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> -	struct xfs_mount *mp = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
> -					struct xfs_mount, m_reclaim_work);
> -
> -	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, SYNC_TRYLOCK);
> -	xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
> -}
> -
>  static void
>  xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag(
>  	struct xfs_perag	*pag)
> @@ -192,9 +154,6 @@ xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag(
>  			   XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
>  	spin_unlock(&mp->m_perag_lock);
>  
> -	/* schedule periodic background inode reclaim */
> -	xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
> -
>  	trace_xfs_perag_set_reclaim(mp, pag->pag_agno, -1, _RET_IP_);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1393,9 +1352,6 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr(
>  {
>  	int			sync_mode = SYNC_TRYLOCK;
>  
> -	/* kick background reclaimer */
> -	xfs_reclaim_work_queue(mp);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * For kswapd, we kick background inode writeback. For direct
>  	 * reclaim, we issue and wait on inode writeback to throttle
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.h
> index 48f1fd2bb6ad..4c0d8920cc54 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.h
> @@ -49,8 +49,6 @@ int xfs_iget(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_trans *tp, xfs_ino_t ino,
>  struct xfs_inode * xfs_inode_alloc(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_ino_t ino);
>  void xfs_inode_free(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  
> -void xfs_reclaim_worker(struct work_struct *work);
> -
>  int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int mode);
>  int xfs_reclaim_inodes_count(struct xfs_mount *mp);
>  long xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr(struct xfs_mount *mp, int nr_to_scan);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index 3e8eedf01eb2..8f76c2add18b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -952,7 +952,6 @@ xfs_mountfs(
>  	 * qm_unmount_quotas and therefore rely on qm_unmount to release the
>  	 * quota inodes.
>  	 */
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&mp->m_reclaim_work);
>  	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, SYNC_WAIT);
>  	xfs_health_unmount(mp);
>   out_log_dealloc:
> @@ -1035,7 +1034,6 @@ xfs_unmountfs(
>  	 * reclaim just to be sure. We can stop background inode reclaim
>  	 * here as well if it is still running.
>  	 */
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&mp->m_reclaim_work);
>  	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, SYNC_WAIT);
>  	xfs_health_unmount(mp);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index a46cb3fd24b1..8c6885d3b085 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
>  	uint			m_chsize;	/* size of next field */
>  	atomic_t		m_active_trans;	/* number trans frozen */
>  	struct xfs_mru_cache	*m_filestream;  /* per-mount filestream data */
> -	struct delayed_work	m_reclaim_work;	/* background inode reclaim */
>  	struct delayed_work	m_eofblocks_work; /* background eof blocks
>  						     trimming */
>  	struct delayed_work	m_cowblocks_work; /* background cow blocks
> @@ -180,7 +179,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
>  	struct workqueue_struct *m_buf_workqueue;
>  	struct workqueue_struct	*m_unwritten_workqueue;
>  	struct workqueue_struct	*m_cil_workqueue;
> -	struct workqueue_struct	*m_reclaim_workqueue;
>  	struct workqueue_struct *m_eofblocks_workqueue;
>  	struct workqueue_struct	*m_sync_workqueue;
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index ebe2ccd36127..a4fe679207ef 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -794,15 +794,10 @@ xfs_init_mount_workqueues(
>  	if (!mp->m_cil_workqueue)
>  		goto out_destroy_unwritten;
>  
> -	mp->m_reclaim_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("xfs-reclaim/%s",
> -			WQ_MEM_RECLAIM|WQ_FREEZABLE, 0, mp->m_fsname);
> -	if (!mp->m_reclaim_workqueue)
> -		goto out_destroy_cil;
> -
>  	mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("xfs-eofblocks/%s",
>  			WQ_MEM_RECLAIM|WQ_FREEZABLE, 0, mp->m_fsname);
>  	if (!mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue)
> -		goto out_destroy_reclaim;
> +		goto out_destroy_cil;
>  
>  	mp->m_sync_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("xfs-sync/%s", WQ_FREEZABLE, 0,
>  					       mp->m_fsname);
> @@ -813,8 +808,6 @@ xfs_init_mount_workqueues(
>  
>  out_destroy_eofb:
>  	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue);
> -out_destroy_reclaim:
> -	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_reclaim_workqueue);
>  out_destroy_cil:
>  	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_cil_workqueue);
>  out_destroy_unwritten:
> @@ -831,7 +824,6 @@ xfs_destroy_mount_workqueues(
>  {
>  	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_sync_workqueue);
>  	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_eofblocks_workqueue);
> -	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_reclaim_workqueue);
>  	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_cil_workqueue);
>  	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_unwritten_workqueue);
>  	destroy_workqueue(mp->m_buf_workqueue);
> @@ -1520,7 +1512,6 @@ xfs_mount_alloc(
>  	spin_lock_init(&mp->m_perag_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&mp->m_growlock);
>  	atomic_set(&mp->m_active_trans, 0);
> -	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mp->m_reclaim_work, xfs_reclaim_worker);
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mp->m_eofblocks_work, xfs_eofblocks_worker);
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mp->m_cowblocks_work, xfs_cowblocks_worker);
>  	mp->m_kobj.kobject.kset = xfs_kset;
> -- 
> 2.24.0.rc0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ