[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191105172525.GA2851576@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:25:25 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: allocate static minor
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:23:57PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> >> udev has a feature of creating /dev/<node> device-nodes if it finds
> >> a devnode:<node> modalias. This allows for auto-loading of modules that
> >> provide the node. This requires to use a statically allocated minor
> >> number for misc character devices.
> >>
> >> However, rfkill uses dynamic minor numbers and prevents auto-loading
> >> of the module. So allocate the next static misc minor number and use
> >> it for rfkill.
> >
> > As rfkill has been around for a long time, what new use case is needing
> > to auto-load this based on a major number?
>
> we have bug reports from iwd users where it fails opening /dev/rfkill. Since iwd can be actually started before the WiFi hardware is fully probed and all its drivers are loaded, we have a race-condition here if rfkill is not capable of auto-loading.
>
> The difference is really that iwd is a fully self-contained WiFi daemon compared to wpa_supplicant which is just some sort of helper. iwd is fully hot plug capable as well compared to wpa_supplicant. It looks like this is exposing the race condition for our users. Frankly, we should have fixed rfkill a long time ago when we fixed uinput, uhid etc, but seems we forgot it. I assume mainly because it magically got loaded in time by some module dependencies.
You need a better email client, one with \n characters...
Anyway, this sounds reasonable, I'll go queue this up for 5.5.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists