linux-kernel - [PATCH 28/50] s390: Add show_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191106030542.868541-29-dima@arista.com>
Date:   Wed,  6 Nov 2019 03:05:19 +0000
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 28/50] s390: Add show_stack_loglvl()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 34bdc60c0b11..1a89f0968742 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -123,20 +123,26 @@ int get_stack_info(unsigned long sp, struct task_struct *task,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
+		       const char *loglvl)
 {
 	struct unwind_state state;
 
-	printk("Call Trace:\n");
+	printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl);
 	if (!task)
 		task = current;
 	unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, NULL, (unsigned long) stack)
-		printk(state.reliable ? " [<%016lx>] %pSR \n" :
-					"([<%016lx>] %pSR)\n",
-		       state.ip, (void *) state.ip);
+		printk(state.reliable ? "%s [<%016lx>] %pSR \n" :
+					"%s([<%016lx>] %pSR)\n",
+		       loglvl, state.ip, (void *) state.ip);
 	debug_show_held_locks(task ? : current);
 }
 
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
+{
+	show_stack_loglvl(task, stack, KERN_DEFAULT);
+}
+
 static void show_last_breaking_event(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	printk("Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n");
-- 
2.23.0