[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191106101349.7dfaa4282db4c7a0239b96f2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:13:49 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzbot+fb77e97ebf0612ee6914@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Limit to INT_MAX in create_blob ioctl
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:24:18 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > Since this is -mm can I have a stable sha1 or something for
> > referencing? Or do you want to include this in the -mm patch bomb for
> > the merge window?
>
> Traditionally these things live in akpm's tree when they are fixes for
> patches in there. I have no idea how the Fixes tags work in that case,
> though...
I queued it immediately ahead of
uaccess-disallow-int_max-copy-sizes.patch so all should be good,
thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists