[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191106030542.868541-42-dima@arista.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 03:05:32 +0000
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 41/50] x86: Add show_stack_loglvl()
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 147a06ee4a48..940cd4c27b17 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -279,7 +279,8 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
}
}
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp,
+ const char *loglvl)
{
task = task ? : current;
@@ -290,7 +291,12 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
if (!sp && task == current)
sp = get_stack_pointer(current, NULL);
- show_trace_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, KERN_DEFAULT);
+ show_trace_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, loglvl);
+}
+
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
+{
+ show_stack_loglvl(task, sp, KERN_DEFAULT);
}
void show_stack_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists