[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191106211039.GF6253@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:10:39 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 12/20] media: ti-vpe: cal: Add DRA76x support
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:58:39PM -0600, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote on Wed [2019-Nov-06 10:57:09 +0200]:
> > Hi Benoit,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 01:31:32PM -0600, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +static struct cal_data dra76x_cal_data = {
> >
> > const?
>
> Hmm, most likely.
>
> >
> > > + .csi2_phy_core = dra76x_cal_csi_phy,
> > > + .num_csi2_phy = ARRAY_SIZE(dra76x_cal_csi_phy),
> > > +
> >
> > This newline seems extra.
> >
> > > + .flags = 0,
> >
> > And flags will be zero in any case, as one more struct members are assigned
> > to.
>
> Is this guaranteed or compiler version dependent?
C standard.
--
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists