lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed,  6 Nov 2019 03:05:29 +0000
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 38/50] unicore32: Add loglvl to c_backtrace()

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level parameter to c_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl()

Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
---
 arch/unicore32/kernel/setup.h  |  2 +-
 arch/unicore32/kernel/traps.c  |  2 +-
 arch/unicore32/lib/backtrace.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/unicore32/kernel/setup.h b/arch/unicore32/kernel/setup.h
index 03e70e37f472..967352323185 100644
--- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/setup.h
+++ b/arch/unicore32/kernel/setup.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ extern void kernel_thread_helper(void);
 extern void __init early_signal_init(void);
 
 extern asmlinkage void __backtrace(void);
-extern asmlinkage void c_backtrace(unsigned long fp);
+extern asmlinkage void c_backtrace(unsigned long fp, const char *loglvl);
 
 extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
 
diff --git a/arch/unicore32/kernel/traps.c b/arch/unicore32/kernel/traps.c
index 3682a4c5d927..2b7d73456865 100644
--- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/unicore32/kernel/traps.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	printk("\n");
 
 	if (ok)
-		c_backtrace(fp);
+		c_backtrace(fp, KERN_DEFAULT);
 }
 
 void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
diff --git a/arch/unicore32/lib/backtrace.S b/arch/unicore32/lib/backtrace.S
index f303671e2a4e..6221944b81f3 100644
--- a/arch/unicore32/lib/backtrace.S
+++ b/arch/unicore32/lib/backtrace.S
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #define sv_fp	v5
 #define sv_pc	v6
 #define offset	v8
+#define loglvl	v9
 
 ENTRY(__backtrace)
 		mov	r0, fp
@@ -27,10 +28,11 @@ ENTRY(c_backtrace)
 ENDPROC(__backtrace)
 ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 #else
-		stm.w	(v4 - v8, lr), [sp-]	@ Save an extra register
+		stm.w	(v4 - v10, lr), [sp-]	@ Save an extra register
 						@ so we have a location...
 		mov.a	frame, r0		@ if frame pointer is zero
 		beq	no_frame		@ we have no stack frames
+		mov	loglvl, r1
 
 1:		stm.w	(pc), [sp-]		@ calculate offset of PC stored
 		ldw.w	r0, [sp]+, #4		@ by stmfd for this CPU
@@ -95,9 +97,10 @@ for_each_frame:
 		bua	for_each_frame
 
 1006:		adr	r0, .Lbad
-		mov	r1, frame
+		mov	r1, loglvl
+		mov	r2, frame
 		b.l	printk
-no_frame:	ldm.w	(v4 - v8, pc), [sp]+
+no_frame:	ldm.w	(v4 - v10, pc), [sp]+
 ENDPROC(__backtrace)
 ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 
@@ -128,8 +131,11 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 		add	v7, v7, #1
 		cxor.a	v7, #6
 		cmoveq	v7, #1
-		cmoveq	r1, #'\n'
-		cmovne	r1, #' '
+		bne	201f
+		adr	r0, .Lcr
+		mov	r1, loglvl
+		b.l	printk
+201:
 		ldw.w	r3, [stack]+, #-4
 		mov	r2, reg
 		csub.a	r2, #8
@@ -141,18 +147,20 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
 		add	r2, r2, #0x10		@ so r2 need add 16
 201:
 		adr	r0, .Lfp
+		mov	r1, loglvl
 		b.l	printk
 2:		sub.a	reg, reg, #1
 		bns	1b
 		cxor.a	v7, #0
 		beq	201f
 		adr	r0, .Lcr
+		mov	r1, loglvl
 		b.l	printk
 201:		ldm.w	(instr, reg, stack, v7, pc), [sp]+
 
-.Lfp:		.asciz	"%cr%d:%08x"
-.Lcr:		.asciz	"\n"
-.Lbad:		.asciz	"Backtrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
+.Lfp:		.asciz	"%sr%d:%08x "
+.Lcr:		.asciz	"%s\n"
+.Lbad:		.asciz	"%sBacktrace aborted due to bad frame pointer <%p>\n"
 		.align
 .Ldsi:		.word	0x92eec000 >> 14	@ stm.w sp, (... fp, ip, lr, pc)
 		.word	0x92e10000 >> 14	@ stm.w sp, ()
-- 
2.23.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ