[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42160baa-0e9d-73d0-bf72-58bdbacf10ff@c-s.fr>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:41:08 +0100
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table
helpers
Le 06/11/2019 à 04:22, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
>
>
> On 10/28/2019 10:59 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> + -----------------------
>> + | arch |status|
>> + -----------------------
>> + | alpha: | TODO |
>> + | arc: | TODO |
>> + | arm: | TODO |
>> + | arm64: | ok |
>> + | c6x: | TODO |
>> + | csky: | TODO |
>> + | h8300: | TODO |
>> + | hexagon: | TODO |
>> + | ia64: | TODO |
>> + | m68k: | TODO |
>> + | microblaze: | TODO |
>> + | mips: | TODO |
>> + | nds32: | TODO |
>> + | nios2: | TODO |
>> + | openrisc: | TODO |
>> + | parisc: | TODO |
>> + | powerpc: | TODO |
>> + | ppc32: | ok |
Note that ppc32 is a part of powerpc, not a standalone arch.
Maybe something like the following would be more correct:
| powerpc/32: | ok |
| powerpc/64: | TODO |
Christophe
>> + | riscv: | TODO |
>> + | s390: | TODO |
>> + | sh: | TODO |
>> + | sparc: | TODO |
>> + | um: | TODO |
>> + | unicore32: | TODO |
>> + | x86: | ok |
>> + | xtensa: | TODO |
>> + -----------------------
>
> While here, are there some volunteers to test this on any of the
> 'yet to be tested and supported' platforms ?
>
> - Anshuman
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists