[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4a2462cf810c4468638522d901b6416d1a770a4.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:51:59 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "dmurphy@...com" <dmurphy@...com>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"jacek.anaszewski@...il.com" <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 14/15] gpio: Add definition for GPIO direction
Hello Linus,
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 16:05 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:48 PM Vaittinen, Matti
> <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
>
> > > Good initiative (and I will see a ton of janitorial patches as a
> > > result of this...)
> >
> > I have somewhere near 62 patches waiting to be sent =) They're
> > pretty
> > small but I'd appreciate thorough review as they're mostly
> > untested...
> > Do you mind receiving them all in one go? Or do you think I should
> > send
> > the series in smaller chuncks?
>
> I would be fine with one patch introducing the defines and then
> one big patch switching everybody and their dog over to using
> these definitions.
>
> I usually keep to a patch being "one technical step" and it is
> clearly (IMO) one step to introduce the defines and one step
> to make use of it in all legacy drivers.
>
> It's late in the kernel cycle but this particular part (the defines
> and switching over old driver to use it) I'd be happy
> to merge for v5.5.
I'll prepare one patch for defines and one large patch for driver
changes on top of GPIO tree then. I'll leave out the last one 62/62 -
it can be applied later if it is considered a good idea - I'd
appreciate if you / Bartosz had the time to check it though.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists