[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5abf94c6-f2bb-b317-4796-3f9ea1fbf55e@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 07:24:31 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <vigneshr@...com>, <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
CC: <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/20] mtd: spi-nor: Print debug message when the read
back test fails
On 11/05/2019 02:37 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> On 02/11/19 4:53 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Demystify where the EIO error occurs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>> ---
> I think this is a small enough change that can be squashed into previous
> patch itself
>
I made separate patches because this is a separate logical change. The previous
patch extends the check on all bits of the Status Register, while this one
prints a debug message in case of EIO. Thus I tried to have a single logical
change contained in a single patch. I'm clearly no expert in this (Boris asked
me in v3 to split patches because I did too many things in one patch :) ), so I
would keep this as is, but if you still feel that it should be squashed, then
I'll do it. Please let me know.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists